What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?
If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. what is a safe distance from a cell tower 's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could result in various possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
While this sounds like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.
But, what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
Learn more here is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.